Raw Paleo Forum Subscribe to Raw Paleo Forum by Email
September 02, 2010, 11:19:40 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome New Members, to the Raw Paleo Diet and Lifestyle!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: food poisoning AGAIN  (Read 1803 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
invisible
Elder
****
Offline Offline

Australia Australia

Posts: 325


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2010, 10:16:44 PM »

Hey GS what do you classify as a hydrating fruit? just water content?
Logged
alphagruis
Chief
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
France France

Posts: 539



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: February 03, 2010, 05:17:39 AM »

She has healthy doubts.  I think that's fine.
I'm ready to change any time when the need arises.
So far omnivore meat + hydrating fruit is working great for me.

I agree. It's ridiculous, childish and pretty pretentious to claim that one of us has found out the optimal ideal diet just because it seems to work and improve our heath after a few months or even years on it.

Things are much much much more complex, unfortunately.

So far raw omnivore fatty meat+ fish+ shellfish+ eggs +  fruit + leafy veggies is working great for me too. Yet I would certainly not claim that this is the only healthy diet for homo sapiens....
Logged

Nature is wont to hide herself. Heraclitus

Nature is a collective idea, and though its essence exist in each individual of the species, can never its perfection inhabit a single object. Henri Fuseli
Nicola
Shaman
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Switzerland Switzerland

Posts: 452



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: February 03, 2010, 07:20:12 AM »

Nicola's father isn't the problem. From her posts it's clear even she isn't convinced that RPD is a healthy way of eating.

I need to have doubts; we always need to question life!

My father would never read a book on diet - he knows it all better and can live with it; most people can - my brother eats what he thinks is food, does his job (his got a good job) in the way he feels is ideal...they don't have an ED - that's only for people fishing around in the internet.

So let's be correct - we are all looking for peace of mind!

I have to learn to deal with my own thoughts - is raw paleo the answer? If I ask my father or brother; NO!

Nicola
Logged
razmatazz
Egg Thief
**
Offline Offline

United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 44


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: February 03, 2010, 02:55:26 PM »

Just posting an update, went to the doc (different doc from the last one who diagnosed a UTI)  and explained all my symptoms, he said it could be kidney stones (you were right lex!). I've got a blood test and urine test next week, and getting an ultrasound scan. Still have to get the blood results from the other doc from the last time this happened.
Hopefully i will get to the bottom of this soon...my symptoms have eased alot, i can get by with day to day life though there is still dull pain on my left and back, and my stomach keeps making gurgling sounds, so still not 100% back on my feet Sad. Eating seems to help a bit now as well (whereas before it seemed to worsen it). I've just been eating raw lamb chops and a bit of cooked vegetables (eg mushrooms and butternut squash)
Logged
PaleoPhil
Mammoth Hunter
******
Online Online

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 2364


mostly-raw facultative carnivore


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: February 03, 2010, 04:09:11 PM »

I'm guessing that summer squash are less toxic than butternut squash, because summer squash can be eaten raw (though you can steam or saute them if you must).
Logged

> "Medicine improved exponentially when the tinkering barber surgeons took over from the high theorists. They just went with what worked, irrespective of why it worked." -Nassim Taleb
> "no one would touch this type of diet unless they'd tried everything else and this diet alone worked" -T.D.
> Tinkering with dairy & gluten elimination worked for me. I found a theory that explained it (Eaton's Paleolithic nutrition), which pointed me toward more tinkering, with more success. -Me
lex_rooker
Trailblazer
Chief
*****
Online Online

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 862



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: February 03, 2010, 06:28:50 PM »

.... though there is still dull pain on my left and back, ...

Glad you went for a second opinion.  The statement above leads me to suspect that you might have a kidney infection as well.  Renal stones usually don't cause a dull ache unless you have a very large one (some get to the size of golf balls).  If you lightly hit your lower back with your fist you will feel pain on the side where there is infection.  My recommendation is not to fool around with this.  If you have an infection then take antibiotics.  A kidney infection, if it is not taken care of, could destroy the kidney.

Lex
Logged
goodsamaritan
Global Moderator
Mammoth Hunter
*****
Online Online

Gender: Male
Philippines Philippines

Posts: 2656



View Profile WWW
« Reply #36 on: February 03, 2010, 06:32:43 PM »

Hey GS what do you classify as a hydrating fruit? just water content?

If it feels hydrating and quenches thirst for long periods of time, it is hydrating:

- watermelons
- melons
- coconuts
- papayas
- avocados

When nothing else is available, I get cold water and squeeze calamansi / lemon in it and wait for a minute or two then drink.
Logged

Expert Linux Network Administrator to maintain Dedicated Servers. Contact me! http://www.filipinowebservices.com
100 Gigs of Email Offer with http://www.100gighost.com
Cure All Diseases Guide http://www.curemanual.com
My Family Health Blog http://www.myhealthblog.org
My obsession with health began here Eczema Cure & Psoriasis Cure
Diabetes cure with High Fat Low Carb Paleo Diet.
miles
Chief
*****
Online Online

Gender: Male
United Kingdom United Kingdom

Posts: 779


Carnivore


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: February 03, 2010, 08:50:42 PM »

One thing I find difficult here is that lots of people seem to go raw paleo, before just going paleo, so they seem to attribute the +'s to rawpaleo, when the things they notice they'd get on cooked meat paleo too(ofc, rawpaleo, if done right probably has the potential to be much better than cooked but most people probably wouldn't notice the differences attributed to the meat being raw unless they'd already been for a while on cooked meat). So either they think 'You win some you lose some' and accept the rough with the smooth, losing their problems from grain/legume/dairy/salt intolerances and replacing them with others.. Or they think to go back to their SMD... One reason why it's hard for me to take info from here.

People can't think, and give me balanced answers/responses about things to do with rawpaleo/raw meat, when they only have the SMD to compare it to. They'll come up with all sorts of reasons in their head as to why they have the negative effects, because surely it must be good with the positives they've also experienced... This will cause a sort of defensiveness too.

I am quite confident that rawpaleo, probably almost all meat, with VLC is much better than to have cooked meat. However, if someone doesn't take the step of first going with cooked meat(unless they are 'lucky' enough to get it right straight away) then they will not be able to identify what is due to raw and what is due to more generally 'paleo'. Severe problems being caused from eating the wrong raw animal food, they won't take note of, since to them it's minor compared to what they had with the SMD.

One of the key principles of paleo anyway, is to only eat food which in its' natural state, could be eaten raw. A cashew(nut), for example, although 'fine'(on the face of things) to eat raw in abundance from a plastic packet, would be virtually impossible to obtain edibly, in its' natural state(therefore it should not be assumed that we are suitably adapted to handle all its' constituents). Conversely, meat, in its' most natural state would be perfectly edible raw. However, if there are less-natural methods of raising, 'extracting', carving, storing, delivering etc of the meat, it may not be safe to eat raw; therefore you'd cook it to allow for anything that could've gone wrong. The closer you are to eating an animal which has grown up and lived in an environment which it evolved naturally over a lengthy period of time to exist in, and would've been available to humans as prey, and the closer your methods of killing it and eating it are to how a 'wild-human' would've done it, the less likely anything could go wrong, and the less need there may be for compensatory measures(e.g. cooking).

Is cooking bad? I would say almost certainly, yes. Can some meat be worse to have raw than cooked? Even that I do not know. However, are there things that many raw-meat eaters here do, regards to their consumption of raw meat, which, if they'd first tried cooked, they'd realise weren't right. Probably yes.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2010, 09:26:50 PM by miles » Logged
goodsamaritan
Global Moderator
Mammoth Hunter
*****
Online Online

Gender: Male
Philippines Philippines

Posts: 2656



View Profile WWW
« Reply #38 on: February 03, 2010, 10:10:23 PM »

Hmmm..... Miles,

I did raw Paleo for 4 or so months first.  (2008)

Then I experimented with cooked pork meat for a month.  

I had to end my experiment because I felt bad and started having pimples.  

So I returned to raw paleo.

Does this make sense?

Logged

Expert Linux Network Administrator to maintain Dedicated Servers. Contact me! http://www.filipinowebservices.com
100 Gigs of Email Offer with http://www.100gighost.com
Cure All Diseases Guide http://www.curemanual.com
My Family Health Blog http://www.myhealthblog.org
My obsession with health began here Eczema Cure & Psoriasis Cure
Diabetes cure with High Fat Low Carb Paleo Diet.
lex_rooker
Trailblazer
Chief
*****
Online Online

Gender: Male
United States United States

Posts: 862



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: February 03, 2010, 10:11:38 PM »

Miles,
I went lightly cooked paleo first, then meat only (cooked med rare as that is the way I used to like my meat) as an experiment after reading Steffannson's articles in Harper's linked at the Yahoo RVAF Group, and finally stopped cooking the meat just on the principle that it shouldn't be necessary from an evolutionary point of view.

The honest truth is, I believe that I got 95%+ of the health benefits just by converting from SAD (high in grains and dairy), to lightly cooked Paleo (eating mostly meat but also a salad every day and occasionally a piece of fruit).  I now perfer my meat raw (or extra rare when it must be cooked as when eating out), so that is the way I will probably continue to eat it.  I may add a small salad or a bit of fruit to my diet in the future as I don't think there is any magic in being totally ZC.  I also don't think that there is a problem lightly cooking most foods as long as they are foods we evolved to eat.  Eating inappropriate foods is our bigest problem.  Get rid of those and you're likely to resolve a whole host of health issues.  Eating most foods raw would just be adding a bit of icing to the cake (so to speak Wink) - probably not critical for most people, but the crowning glory for the purists among us.

The bottom line is that lightly cooked paleo seems to be no better or worse than raw paleo (or ZC for that matter).  At least that has been my experience.

Lex

Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Raw Paleolithic Diet Info Site
Subscribe to raw paleo diet
All contents of Raw Paleo Diet Forum, unless otherwise noted, are © 2009 Raw Paleo Diet Forum, All Rights Reserved.
Paleo Diet
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!