...I am fascinated by your assertion that someone who you don't agree with or understand has a pretty severe psychiatric illness.
And I'm fascinated that you would read so much more into my words than what I actually wrote. Here are my actual words:
"Moulden
reminds me of someone I know with pretty severe psychiatric illness."
If he is ill, I empathize with him, because then that means he's likely not getting the help he needs and his fans are enabling his illness by ignoring it, which would be sad. If he's not ill, then what is his excuse for preaching such nonsense?
Do you feel this way often? Come sit on the couch and share with me. What does this remind you of? What are you feeling now? Is there anything else you're not saying? What does it feel like when you close your eyes? Are you really sure you liked your mother? ...
No, I've never made that comment about any other guru (you can check my past posts if you don't believe me). Why the defensiveness? No need to ascribe imaginary things to me. I was just noting that I observed disturbing similarities between him and an ill friend of mine. That's true. Am I supposed to lie to make you feel better? I hope the similarities are coincidental, but if you check out the comments on this video of his you'll see that someone else noticed it and was much harsher than I:
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPOPRnYjF0s]
Do you have any evidence that there is an alternative explanation for his unusual behavior and rapid-fire jibberish? I'm open to alternatives.
It's interesting that you brought up the term "quack." I didn't use it, but now that you mention it, what I've seen in his own videos and what I read about him does fit that term, and I'm not part of allopathic medicine, nor do I make any profit from disagreeing with him, so you can't claim that only people from allopathic medicine or with a financial motive disagree with him.
Unfortunately, other people may suffer because of the strange advice he gives and if anyone does take it seriously, then it should be refuted, which is why I presented other links so people can get a fuller picture. Freedom of information access is people's right. I'll let people check the various sources and decide for themselves what they think.
Having said all of this I have to agree with your original assertion that (diet is the problem/solution) "All of us here who have had illnesses clear up from dietary change know this isn't true."
That was my main point (though I would qualify it by saying diet is the
"primary" problem, not the only one)--this Dr. Moulder is missing the boat by focusing so narrowly on vaccines. I think there are problems with vaccines, but I don't ascribe most chronic illnesses primarily to them. It's a crime that so much time and energy is being wasted by focusing on vaccines. In my view, diet is a more likely primary cause of Asperger's and autism than vaccines. Children are likely needlessly suffering because people like him are leading them in the wrong directions.
Personally I truly believe that the Allopathic medical system is generally populated by well-meaning, intelligent, conceited, overpaid quacks.
I generally agree, and unless he starts talking about the connection between modern foods and the chronic diseases he mentions, I would add this Dr. Moulder to your list of quacks.